<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for South Australian Murray Irrigators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://samurrayirrigators.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://samurrayirrigators.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>www.samurrayirrigators.org.au</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:54:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Tim Whetstone&#8217;s &#8216;Tiser response by JimBob51</title>
		<link>http://samurrayirrigators.wordpress.com/2008/08/01/tim-whetstones-tiser-response/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>JimBob51</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samurrayirrigators.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Tim, Until the Federal Government takes control of the allocation process I do not believe that the downstream Irrigator has a hope in hell. The upstream wealth also seems to be allowing an even greater imbalance in the amount of water taken before it arrives in SA.
Also some of the Northern Rivers Programs diverting water over the range to The River System must seriously be considered. The Clarence River Flood Mitigation program alone would ensure greater flow without damaging the River Environment - why will these programs not be considered. Good response keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, Until the Federal Government takes control of the allocation process I do not believe that the downstream Irrigator has a hope in hell. The upstream wealth also seems to be allowing an even greater imbalance in the amount of water taken before it arrives in SA.<br />
Also some of the Northern Rivers Programs diverting water over the range to The River System must seriously be considered. The Clarence River Flood Mitigation program alone would ensure greater flow without damaging the River Environment &#8211; why will these programs not be considered. Good response keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tim Whetstone&#8217;s &#8216;Tiser response by Tim Whetstone&#8217;s &#8216;Tiser response</title>
		<link>http://samurrayirrigators.wordpress.com/2008/08/01/tim-whetstones-tiser-response/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Whetstone&#8217;s &#8216;Tiser response</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samurrayirrigators.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] Original South Australian Murray Irrigators [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original South Australian Murray Irrigators [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
